DSpace

King Saud University Repository >
King Saud University >
COLLEGES >
Science Colleges >
College of Foods And Agricultural Science >
College of Foods And Agricultural Science >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10111

Title: Reliability of Gypsum Determination in Soils by Three Existing Simple Methods
Authors: M.H. AI-Awajy
M.S. Heakal
A. S. Modaihsh
M. I. Chouddary
Issue Date: 1994
Publisher: Arab Gulf J. ScienL Res
Abstract: The reliability of three existing simple and relatively rapid methods was evaluated using synthetic (standard) samples (2 - 80 %, w/w gypsum) and samples from 35 horizons of Aridisols and Entisols in Saudi Arabia. Method (1) is based on kinetics of the dehydration process of soil at 150 *C. Method (II) is based on loss of crystal water of gypsum upon heating at 105 'C. In method (Ill) gypsum was measured conductometrically after its extraction in water, precipitation in acetone and redissolution in water. Consistently, the thermogravimetric methods overestimated whereas the conductometric method underestimated the gypsum, present in the synthetic samples. ]be accuracy obtained followed the order I > 11 > Ill. Constant errors were observed in the range of 2 - 35 % gypsum whereas proportional errors were observed in the range of 35 - 60 % gypsum. The composite measure of accuracy and precision, however, indicated that the three methods were of similar high reliability; [error2 + (standard deviation)' 1A0.66 % gypsum; using two independent measurements. Differences in the accuracy of methods II and Ill (over the range 2 - 80 % gypsum) were used to obtain trends of the accuracy that a~ated measurements in the 35 sod samples. Of these measurements, 25 showed accuracy comparable to that obtained from the synthetic samples. Two samples (sandtextured) yielded more gypsum by method Ill whereas two Gypsiorthids (relatively rich in soluble Ca") gave less gypsum by method 11 than methods I and Ill. Six samples of different properties showed smaller amounts, than expected, by method Ill. In spite of these discrepancies, the three methods are sufficiently reliable for soil gypsum determination (taxonomical and managemental) and for comparative studies.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10111
Appears in Collections:College of Foods And Agricultural Science

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
258.docx11.99 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback