DSpace

King Saud University Repository >
King Saud University >
COLLEGES >
Humanities Colleges >
College of Education >
College of Education >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5149

Title: Modification of the standing long jump test enhances ability to predict anaerobic performance
Authors: Almuzaini, Khalid S.
Fleck, Steven J.
Keywords: Naerobic power
Wingate
Vertical jump
Standing long jump
Peak torque
Isokinetic strength
Issue Date: Jul-2008
Publisher: National Strength and Conditioning Association, Colorado, USA, through Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citation: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: 22(4); 1265–1272
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether modifying the standing long jump test would enhance its ability to be a better predictor of anaerobic performance compared to other common anaerobic power tests. Three modified box long jump (MBLJ) tests were performed using 1, 2, or 3 boxes. Subjects consisted of 38 healthy males (age, 21.7 6 1.7 years) who performed all the testing procedures. All 3 variations of the MBLJ test showed significant correlations (p , 0.05) with the vertical jump (VJ); standing long jump (SLJ); 50-, 100-, 200-, 400-m runs; long jump; triple jump; and shot put ability (r = 0.362–0.891). All 3 variations of the MBLJ test also showed significant correlations with isokinetic peak torque knee extension and flexion, Wingate mean power (W), and Wingate mean power per kilogram (W/kg) (r = 0.357–0.504). Generally, correlations of the 3 MBLJ tests were stronger than correlations between VJ and SLJ ability to the same measure of power. Generally, the 3-box MBLJ tests showed stronger correlations with measures of power than the 1- and 2-box MBLJ tests. Multiple linear regression models indicated that the 3-box MBLJ test is a major predictor of the track and field performances compared to the other tests of anaerobic power. Along with other independent variables, the 3- box MBLJ test explained 55%, 44%, 51%, 61%, 52%, and 72% of the variance of 50-, 100-, 200-, and 400-m runs; long jump; and triple jump performance, respectively. In conclusion, due to the significant correlations between the MBLJ tests, especially the 3-box version, and other measures of power, these tests are appropriate for testing lower body power.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181739838
http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Abstract/2008/07000/Modification_of_the_Standing_Long_Jump_Test.33.aspx
ISSN: Print: 1064-8011, Online: 1533-4287
Appears in Collections:College of Education

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
MODIFICATION OF THE STANDING LONG JUMP TEST.pdf108.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback