|
DSpace at King Saud University >
King Saud University >
COLLEGES >
Science Colleges >
College of Foods And Agricultural Science >
College of Foods And Agricultural Science >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7970
|
| Title: | Effect of irrigation intervals and nitrogen fertilizer rates on fresh forage yield of sudangrass [sorghum sudanense (piper) stapf.] |
| Authors: | Al-Suhaibani, Nasser A. |
| Keywords: | Effect Irrigation Intervals Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates Fresh Forage Yield Sudangrass Sorghum Sudanense (Piper) |
| Issue Date: | 2006 |
| Publisher: | King Saud University |
| Citation: | Food Science & Agricultural Research Center: 142; 1-14 |
| Abstract: | A field experiment was conducted in the Agricultural
Experiments and Research Station, of the College of Food and Agricultural
Sciences, King Saud University, at Dirab, for two consecutive summer
seasons of 2001 and 2002 to investigate the effect of three irrigation (3, 7
and 11 days) intervals, and three urea (%46 N) fertilizer levels (200, 400 and
600 kg ha-1) applied in three equal doses (15 days after emergence, after the
first cut, and after the second cut) on forage yield of sudangrass [Sorghum
sudanense (Piper) Stapf.]. The forage yield was determined over three
successive cuts at 60, 105 and 135 days from planting. The experimental
design used was a split plot with four replications, in which the main plots
were the irrigation intervals, and the sub-plot were the N-fertilizer
treatments. The results showed significant effects for growing season and
irrigation intervals on the forage yield, while the nitrogen treatments were
not effective. Expanding irrigation interval from 3 to 7 and 11 days
decreased the potential yield from 143.6 to 123 and 85.3 ton ha-1,
respectively. Moreover, both 1st and 2nd cut yield was about 85% of the total
obtained forage. According to this study, the growers are advised to take
only two sudangrass forage cuts, using the 7-days irrigation interval. This
practice will conserve more than 50% of irrigation water while the reduction
in forage may be less than 15% of potential yield. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7970 |
| Appears in Collections: | College of Foods And Agricultural Science
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|